"The Robing Room: NJ State Judges

Hon. Robert G. Wilson	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Superior Court
Hunterdon County Vicinage 13	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.9 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 3 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Robert G. Wilson

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4857
Rating:2.8

Comments:
Very poor presiding judge. Way over his head. Cannot manage the Family Division. Has preconceived notions and shows partiality. Very curt to litigants in oral argument. Overall a very disappointing judge to have in our vicinage.

Other

Comment #: NJ4745
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Who gave this judge this job?
He does not understand his job.
He can't do the job.
He hates his job.
So he takes it out on innocent people who are there to seek justice. And what do they get? Gross injustice.
I feel a lot of his cases will have to be reviewed. Who in NJ is responsible for removing rogue judges? Anyone?

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4742
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge does not deserve the title. As others have written, he relishes his ability to ruin other peoples' lives, a reflection of the pathetic mind that inhabits his body -- a Napoleon complex. Wilson personifies [Redacted by Ed.] he is unfamiliar with the facts of the case; patently biased in his proceedings and rulings; lacks a judicial temperament. [Redacted by Ed.] This site should not attempt to protect judges like Wilson. He is unfit for the role.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ4340
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This little pipsqueak of a man loves being a judge in corrupt New Jersey. This wee lazy man relishes his position of power and abuses it to the best of his ability. He proudly announces his refusal in doing the work required in order to be even slightly informed of his cases - for the sheer joy of taunting the powerless victims in his courtroom. He is a perfect fit for the corrupt courtrooms of New Jersey , and he is in like company.

Other

Comment #: NJ3959
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Misogynist, racist. Browbeats and bullies female attorneys and litigants
Conduct unbecoming a judge.
Conflicted interests.
Copies the favored attorney's summations near verbatim.
Unethically controls and conducts witness questioning.
Complaints cause his playing musical benches vs being permanently disrobed.

Other

Comment #: NJ3504
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Whoever took down my truthful post is a coward. The video surveillance would of backed me up of what went on that day. 1st and foremost the plaintiff asked for a reschedule why should my wife lose a days pay for that? 2nd my wife works the 1st shift same as post office why so many certified letters for her to lose more money from work. 1 certified letter should of been efficient. Let alone the judge let the plaintiff( hog the stage) The truth is a 61 year old woman was forced to do extra walking (certified letters) among other letters and extra excessive walking in the courtroom this is a woman that needs not 1 but 2 artificial knees. Not to mention that the plaintiff, judge ,and mediator all knew each other even before she walked in the court room. A 61 year old woman that needs 2 artificial knees had to endure to carry that HEAVY CROSS.