Hon. Michael Antoniewicz See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Bergen County
Vicinage 2
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.8 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Michael Antoniewicz


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ4934
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Did not allow oral argument or consider any evidence that was provided. Awarded all judgements in defendant's favor who was incompliant to requested documents, proofs, and has not complied with previous court orders. His decisions and judgements were made before the hearing even began.

Other

Comment #: NJ4933
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Did not allow oral argument or consider any evidence that was provided. Awarded all judgements in defendant's favor who was incompliant to requested documents, proofs, and has not complied with previous court orders. His decisions and judgements were made before the hearing even began.

Other

Comment #: NJ4932
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Did not even look at evidence provided or allow any explanation. Totally dismissed all previous court orders and based judgements with no proofs, evidence, or arguments. Defendant also did not comply with documents requested yet ruled in favor of them.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4805
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Completely ignored large swaths of evidence and arguments and seemed to draw his own conclusions without considering case law or previous court orders, including one from the appelate court.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4789
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Agree with above posters. He doesn’t know the law on RO and he misses important evidence. Idiot imho.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4781
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Judge doesn’t seem to consider important evidence. Opinions don’t match the evidence presented in trial.
Don’t seem to have a grasp on NJ restraining order laws.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ4385
Rating:5.8
Comments:
Judge has been assigned to RO cases. He doesn’t know the law and doesn’t seem to care all that much that he doesn’t. I will say he has gotten a little better in the past year or so. He’s even-tempered which is a plus but that’s not going to stop him from injecting his opinion in place of actual law.