Hon. Angelo J. Di Camillo See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Camden County
Vicinage 4
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Angelo J. Di Camillo


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ4895
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Angelo Dicamillo ruined my life, when I got home, I wanted to take my life, thats how low he made me feel , when he know nothing about what me and my husband has gone though with our daughter. I wish he could walk in out shoes, he will never be as strong to handle what we have been though. He cant see though the true liars.

Other

Comment #: NJ4894
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He did not allow my witness to approach the stand and give their statement, who, was physically threatened by the plaintiff. He would not allow my to explain a voicemail I left to the plantiff,I told him 3 times my witness are here, an at the end he said oh so yout husband is here and the witness, I said yes I told you this earlier, he has end stage renal failure and is dying. Judge Angelo Dicamillo is so rude , heartless an doesnt let both parties try to make a agreement when no physical violence was involed, just words, and no physical harming words or texts or voicemails. I was degraded and never had any problems in life this was a family matter , an all I was doing was traying to put my family back together for my dying husband, which is the plantiffs dying father. So I had to get finger printed and The judge Angelo Dicamillo said I had no creditablity. He degrades people and doesnt offer mediation ay all. How can he do this to a dying person when all we wanted was just an answer if your dad should die , do you want to be notified ? still no answer in court and he did not make her answer at all. People in the seats were just shaking there heads at the judge and could not beleive the way he treated me, and the plantiffs wife sat behind my husband laughing, what a disgrace.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4826
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Angelo Dicamillo aka: "The restraining order judge."
He granted a restraining order against my son by the ex-girlfriend based off of NO EVIDENCE! Judge DiCamillo said he felt she was more believable (because she cried in the courtroom). We have undeniable proof that she lied to the judge in the courtroom, but I can't give the proof to anyone.
I've reached out to the Ombudsman, Cheif Justice office & court administration, no one would help me and I kept getting told we have to file an appeal to the appellate court (which takes one to two years). Meanwhile, the unjustified restraining order ruined our lives and my sons chance for his child custody. I used to believe good will triumph over evil, but Judge DiCamillo ruined my faith in the judicial system completely. DiCamillo is creating absentee fathers, not by the fathers choice but by DiCamillo's indifference towards men and his favoritism of women.
I cry for my son often because of Judge Angelo DiCamillo's wrongful and unfair sentencing that we are forced to except. I have hard proof the ex lied to the judge, but I can't show it to anyone to prove my sons innocence. Judge Angelo DiCamillo is NOT a fair judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4777
Rating:1.8
Comments:
I had to sit through a couple trials before I could get with mine. It's clear why judge Dicamillo is the most appealed judge for restraining orders in the state. He has absolutely no clue the kind of impact a restraining order has on people's lives in this state. He's clearly plaintiff biased and even more so woman, if you're a woman and cry in his court room it's an automatic win for you he'll even cite a case saying how a woman's tears makes her more credible. He allowed a plantiff to lie throughout their testimony and when reviewing all the evidence stated the plantiff doesn't have to make sense and cited some other case to justify his bias. He was a federal tax judge for most of his career and should have stayed retired, he has no buisness in family court and should be removed immediately and put back in retirement.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4723
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Angelo Dicamillo is not a fair judge.
If you're a woman all you have to do is just cry in his courtroom and he'll rule in your favor. He allows lying, because you don't need any actual evidence to win with him if you cry, I've seen it first-hand. That's how Judge Angelo Dicamillo runs his courtroom. He favors women because he published some articles on domestic abuse. Sorry guy's you're screwed if you get him, doesn't matter what evidence you have.
He should have been removed long ago, but because of the judge shortage he continues to destroy innocent lives with his unfair and biased judgments.
If you're a woman you'll be lucky, if you're a man you'll not be treated fairly. You don't have to believe me, just look at Judge Dicamillo's track record. Sorry guys!

Other

Comment #: NJ4719
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Angelo Dicamillo is unprofessional, biased, unfair, he does not bother to even listen to evidence, he cared more about the clock than the evidence.
[Redacted by Ed.] The opposing attorney told my attorney since it was DiCamillo he took advantage of the situation. Judge Angelo DiCamillo is far from a fair and just Judge, it is unfortunate that so many individuals fall victim to his unprofessional whim and have to suffer with his unfair decision.

Other

Comment #: NJ4712
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge DiCamillo is very biased. He plays favoritism towards women in his judgments.

Other

Comment #: NJ4379
Rating:1.0
Comments:
What an embarrassment to the position held. Honorable… It’s always a pleasure to witness how our tax money is spent and the total incompetency of almost the entire system. This individual was the most unprofessional person I’ve ever dealt with in a courtroom. The disdain for the position is palpable. No one is ever trapped at a job. They can be whatever they want when they grow up.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2959
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Sat in front of Judge DiCamillo on 2 occasions. Fair & to the point. Does not tolerate any games in his court room. Gets right to the point & sees thru the bull. Read’s motions & is prepared

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ57
Rating:6.9
Comments:
You never know with Judge DiCamillo. He can be difficult, and he can be easygoing. He has a sense of righteousness that can be awakened, and has also shown an ability to improve and learn over the years. He's better than average.