Hon. Ned M. Rosenberg See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Essex County
Vicinage 5
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Ned M. Rosenberg


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ1959
Rating:4.0
Comments:
Seemed annoyed to be there and was biased from the start.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ1952
Rating:1.0
Comments:
There is something very strange about this man. He should not be a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ1280
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Simmply the finest Scholarly, courteous, hard working

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: NJ497
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Based on my experience, he rules on
politics and not on the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ242
Rating:9.9
Comments:
Have not had him for a trial, but on several motions and Pre-Trial matters he has displayed diligence, scholarship, courtesy, flexibility, and even handedness. What more could you want?