"The Robing Room: NJ State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Diane Pincus

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2359
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
(1) Judge Diane Pincus sentenced me for a petty disorderly persons offense to 264 days in jail and a year probation. I appealed in pro se. The unpublished two-judge Appellate Division panel decision remanded for resentencing. Judge Pincus resentenced me to the same sentence. I appealed. The Appellate Division affirmed the decision on the grounds of a court rule prohibiting judges from allowing relitigation on the same issue. Judge Pincus should be sent back to the Divorce courts, where spectators can be discouraged or barred from watching her rule on cases!! Judge Pincus gives good grounds to demand a trial by jury in all cases, as originally required by the Magna Carta and the 6th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution!! "Courts ought not be a private preserve for the affluent." Meltzer v. C. Buck LeCraw & Co., dissenting opinion from denial of certiorari written by either Justice Douglas or Justice Black, circa 1961.

Other

Comment #: NJ2355
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Lousy. She does not possess necessary sense of jurisprudence to be an impartial judge. Her comments on cases that are before her indicate a biasis against defendants.