Hon. Jean B. McMaster See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Gloucester County
Vicinage 15
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jean B. McMaster


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ1437
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This judge pays no attention to the rules of civil procedure, and should be removed from the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ1142
Rating:2.6
Comments:
arrogant, lacking in scholarship

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ680
Rating:5.0
Comments:
A bit surprised it seems to simple and yet useufl.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ419
Rating:6.1
Comments:
Had her in a relatively simple personal injury case; was generally fair and knowledgeable. It was a pleasure to try the case with her.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ340
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge would not know the law if it snacked her in her very nasty face. In one word she is an IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!