Hon. Lawrence P. De Bello See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Mercer County
Vicinage 7
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Lawrence P. De Bello


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ1244
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Debello denied me due process with regards to a restraining order and adjourned indefinitely an FRO hearing based on a unconstitutional demand / by the Presiding Judge (Cathrine Fitzpatrick) Handling my Divorce matter.

Judge Debello did not have any evidence presented that supported the adjournment of my TRO matter and as a result I have no visitation with my children despite the lack of substantiated claims regarding the TRO my ex wife filed for as an act of vindictiveness.

Notably my wife had been charged with two criminal counts of harrassment for the issues she obtained a restraining order against me for.

Also notably I have supervised visitation (because I took my son to a Doctor believe it or not) and I have no contact with my wife during visitation anyway... yet my visitation rights are now indefinitely suspended because of issues related to emails that supposedly harrassed my wife... they were legal emails with regard to legal recourse not threats of violence by the way.

Notably my wife kidnapped my children across state lines at the beginning of the divorce and I had advised her that I intend to charge her for the same... she filed a TRO because of this.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ912
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge is clearly well beyond his abilities and should not be a sitting judge.

Other

Comment #: NJ414
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is the Judge with spiritual and physical judgment