Hon. Rosie Lazcano Allred See Rating Details
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court
Bernalillo County
2nd Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Rosie Lazcano Allred



Comment #: NM213
Rating:Not Rated
This tyrant, clearly favors members of the bar over pro se litigants. I have personally seen hearings set and the complainant's attorney is a no show. What do she do, (looks out for her bar members) and resets the hearing, when by judicial rule the cause of action should have been dismissed.

[Redacted by Ed.]

I recently saw a case that she was hearing where a landlord showed up to court, with no lease agreement, no previous pictures or evidence of the property's prior condition, no receipts or invoices of repairs done by the Landlord for alleged damages the renter's caused, and assessed a $8,000 judgment on the renters for damage to the property. It was clear that she did not want this to come back on appeal. The landlord was doing construction on the property while the renter's were occupying the property, thus creating unsafe common areas. The landlord raised their rent by verbal threat.

[Redacted by Ed.]


Comment #: NM211
She allowed defendant attorney to file their answers to a lawsuit. She did not allow the plaintiff to have a jury trial and gave not reason for her decision. It appeared that the hearing for the motion to dismiss was previously orchestrated between her and the defendant's attorney. She determine merit of facts in dispute in the lawsuit taking away fundamental right of all citizens to have jury trial.