Hon. Nan G. Nash See Rating Details
District Judge
District Court
Bernalillo County
2nd Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Nan G. Nash



Comment #: NM238
Appauling the lack of enforcement of Judicial Oversight and Professional Conduct exhibited in her courtroom. Extremely biased against opposing counsel of the Attorneys whom she is known to favor in pleadings and to those who are huge contributors to her campaign and extends favors in lieu of Guardianship appointments. Guardianship families are going to be bilked by the lack of Oversight she extends to her appointees.


Comment #: NM235
Judge Nash appointed colluded Conservators, Guardians, Caregivers that engaged in criminal activity, refused to allow evidence be shown or admitted in courtroom, failed to Sanction Attorneys, Conservators who committed State and Federal Crimes. Beneficiary's and family's were not allowed to have a voice in the courtroom, some silenced by going to jail for contempt when they tried to speak out


Comment #: NM234
This judge is terrible. No over site of her probate appointees at all. They run wild and she does zip !! Shes no judge !!

Probation or Pretrial Officer

Comment #: NM216
Biased, knowledgeable about the case, refused one of the attorneys to submit and show documents in open court of the illegal activity of the Trustee of the case. She openly displyed Failure to Due Process in the entire case. History in court records show the collusion of this Judge with same attorneys in Probate cases and allows the abuse of exploitation to proceed that they are apart of to the detriment of the clients