Hon. Patricia P. Satterfield See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Patricia P. Satterfield


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12870
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Vicious [redacted] and angry as the day is long. She is, in short, a pri--. The democratic party in Queens continues their politically driven behavior to put people this garbage on the bench. I've seen it for the last 30 years and I fully expect it to continue well into the future.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12072
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is as stupid and incompetentin the Supreme Court as she was in the Civil Court. You know hat they say about incompetenvce-pormote. A true jackass

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11280
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is nasty, arrogant and incompetent. What else needs to be said to be a Judge here in Queens, or for that matter anyplace?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1753
Rating:4.3
Comments:
Very nice as a person. Has what she does not realize is a very superficial knowledge of law. Gets defensive and testy when challenged. If you can get her to listen (big "if") she can be moved or at least will let you make a record. If she were in a different county, she would be a worse than average assignment. In Queens, she's better than average.