Hon. David Kirshblum See Rating Details

JHO/Support Magistrates
New York County
See Comments
New York City

Attorney Average Rating:   3.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. David Kirshblum


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NY12215
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
3 years later. Now 2021. Due to Queens Family Court Judge David Kirshblum refusal to lock Sandra Pazza Putana Lante up for numerous counts of per jury. Regarding my child support payments. The Child Support Office are now improperly garnishing my weekly paycheck for $173.07 weekly i.e $750 per month. Despite paying a $607 fee none of these idiots can explain is for. To drop it back to the court order of $500. My payment history shows credits again. Despite a court order for $500 per month. But the weekly $173.07 continues. State Senator Joe Addabbo's District Representative Carl Moore agrees is improper. If not illegal. But here we are again. They are ignoring him also. As a state legislator. Due to Judge Kirshblum's failure to lock Sandra Pazza Putana Lante up for Per Jury. Despite my court order for $500 and the court papers proving she has been court ordered for psychiatric treatment. When will Judge Kirshblum stop being Liberally Biased and starting being an impartial Judge in my daughter's best interest and safety Maybe start giving me a fair shake. Its now 2021 ? Judge Kirshblum is a disgrace.
Maybe its time to start mailing in Factual Postcards to Queens Family Court proving Judge Kirshblum Liberal Bias and the damage its doing. Lante has denied my court ordered visitation for almost a year now. Because she knows this incompetent Judge. Will make her face zero legal consequences. Due to his Liberal Bias. Fed up with this Liberal Bias

Litigant

Comment #: NY10803
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Gynocentric, anti-male, anti-family, anti-child. He should be disbarred.

Litigant

Comment #: NY10201
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Lousy when a judge ignores numerous counts of per jury. Signing numerous sworn Affidavits Sandra Lante stated she received no child support payments. But my endorsed child support payments. Proved her statements to Judge David Kirshblum to be per jury. Kirshblum refused to prosecute or award legal fees as damages. Kirshblum blatant liberal bias has emboldened Sandra Lante to deny my joint custody and vistation. He's a disgrace and should be thrown off the bench.

Litigant

Comment #: NY9555
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I'm very appreciative to Hon. Kirshblum, he was fair in my case. My situation was that I wasn't getting CS for three months- and he made it clear that paying CS is suppose to be consistent and when mandated not when you decide you want too.. Thanks you.

Other

Comment #: NY8252
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am still recovering, years later, from this man's decisions and the vile way he spoke to me, under the protection of his armed security guards. A vile, disgraceful character.

Litigant

Comment #: NY7040
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge was rude and downright obnoxious. He ridiculed me in every way before getting on with the facts of the case. I recently lost my business and subsequently my income. With full documentation in hand (recent tax documents, notarized profit & loss statements and balance sheets), I requested a downward modification in child support. When my business was in operation, my payments were up to date and since I owned the company, my payments were not garnished. I signed and sent in the checks. Obviously, something changed when I started sending in much smaller amounts. Kirshblum took my documentation and asked me for my tax documents for the year of the divorce. This was not required by the court, according to the legal documentation list provided non-custodial fathers. He then said he would review the case and I had to return in six months. During this time the support remained unchanged. No brainer-I fell horribly behind. Five months later, I get a letter from the court and Kirshblum, saying that the downward modification was denied. Reason- I found a part time job working at Sears! Like a desperation $10/hour job is going to pay anything. Someone please remove this idiot from the court!

Litigant

Comment #: NY6143
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Kirshblum is completely Liberally Biased He refused to prosecute my ex wife for per jury Despite overwhelmingly factual evidence She continues to violate ever court and deny my court ordered visitation While the Child Support Collection Unit relentlessly harassed my last job to set up an account they could garnish To the point they subpenaed my employer to court Resulting in me loosing my job Despite credits in child support payments My unemployment was also garnished Resulting in me having to stop on line payments with Expert Pay Based on Sandra Lante's continued false statements of per jury Judge Kirshblum or Judge Esposito in The Supreme Court have refused to make Sandra face any legal consequences For criminal behavior that would have me in Rikers Sandra Lante is allowed make a joke of the legal system Due to these judges blatant Liberal bias

Litigant

Comment #: NY5843
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He refused to prosecute Sandra Lante for per jury or award my legal fees as damages He has allowed her garnish my unemployment through the Child Support Collection Unit After caused me to loose my job through their harassment of my employer Which Senator Addabbo's office can support Despite $500 in credit with Chase Expert That I've had to stop Pay Family Court has given me a court date of February 10th 2015 to file for a downward modification Judge Kirshblum is aware of Sandra Lante's psychiatric commitment Judge Kirshblum's flat out bias and incompetence in handling of this case Has caused me severe financial hardship After the garnishment and taxes I receive $140 per week in employment Call Carl in Senator Addabbo's 719-738-1111 He can support these facts A disgrace

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY4418
Rating:3.3
Comments:
I agree with comment#1690,this man has made my life miserable, I have provided the court with all of my financial information he insists that I pay an amount that a I cannot afford,(unemployed/recently returned from overseas co that went bankrupt since 9/11) the amount accumulated is impossible to pay
my credit is terrible due to over due amount, I am not able to get a loan for the recovery of my family business.
and will have to close by the end of this year.

Litigant

Comment #: NY1690
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Mr. Kirshblum displays a snotty abusive tone. He insistes on being called "support magistrate" rather than "Mr." which shows an emotional insecurity that translates into his horrible treatment of litigants standing before him seeking fairness and equity, instead, Mr. Kirshblum attacks rather than "works with" the Father. I've heard many stories about Mr. Kirshblum but most dads believe complaining will not make a difference. My job is to get these Dads to file their complaints againstyou Mr. Kirshblum. Obviously Mr. Kirshblum was placed in his position as a political favor to help inflate the child support numbers. Get off the bench David.