Hon. Orlando Marrazzo, Jr. See Rating Details

Housing Court
Richmond (Staten Island) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Orlando Marrazzo, Jr.


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11716
Top Judge, smart, obviously understands what it's like to try cases. Very even handed great temperament, wish they were all like this.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11408
Excellent Judge and gentleman. Seems like he understands what it is to try cases and is pleasant and even handed.


Comment #: NY9977
I was present in Richmond County Supreme
Court on April 10, 2018 during the motion hearing brought by defendant in the case of Maria Baldari against Armando Montelango Seminars. The Judge was totally unprepared for the hearing. He did not possess or familiarize himself with any of the extensive court filings submitted by the defense in support of the motion or by the plaintiff in opposition. Judge Marrazzo was not in any way familiar with the original motion. The judge did not even have a copy of the motion under consideration. A copy of the motion had to be provided to the judge by plaintiff. The judge then treated the pro se plaintiff dismissively and with disdain. Similar treatment was afforded other pro se litigants. These self-represented litigants were treated as mere impediments to the expeditious functioning of the court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY6733
Every Judge should be as respectful of the process as this one. Clearly a judge who worked for a living and checks his ego at the door rather then trying to belittle the very people who allow his position to exist. The practice would be more pleasurable if more judges remembered what their purpose is like this one does.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY5779
A man who truly deserves the title "Your Honor" - always tries to resolve matters, doesnt play favorites, was a practicing lawyer and he gets it!