"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

Confirm E-mail Address

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

What others have said about Hon. Linda Christopher

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY6802
Rating:1.7

Comments:
Someone needs to supervise this now Supervising Judge of the Matrimonial Part in Westchester County. As with Referee Irene Ratner, if you're representing a husband, and she doesn't like you as an attorney (especially if you're an intelligent, attractive, female attorney), it's all over for the client in the first court appearance (2 weeks before trial). She actually said at the pre-trial conference, that even though she didn't know anything about the facts, that my client should have accepted his wife's outrageous child support demand. WOW!! This is why she does everything off-the-record, and if you have the audacity to ask to go on-the-record, she says (off-the-record, of course!!) that you are trying to throw her under the bus!! Hey Judge, it isn't about you!! It's about being fair & impartial to BOTH clients. She needs to be transferred to a criminal court (where juries make the decision; not a miserable, vicious, ungrateful female), or banished to a windowless room, where she has no contact with the public. She is yet another example of a "public" servant, who actually only serves her own ego.