"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Hon. Paul I. Marx	See Rating Details
Supreme Court
Putnam County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 2.6 - 4 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Paul I. Marx

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13373
Rating:2.3

Comments:
The most unprofessional Judge in all of the lower Hudson Valley. Nasty for no reason, condescending and inappropriate comments on the record to make himself feel better. He was a former plaintiff attorney (bad one too) who now sits on his throne and single handedly lowers the esteem of the judicial profession. An embarrassment to his fellow colleagues. Good riddance in just a few short years.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12095
Rating:2.0

Comments:
Nasty. Has no business being a judge. Inflexible, even with "great cause". Doesn't know the details and is lazy.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11078
Rating:5.3

Comments:
The practice is tough enough without needless aggravation added to the mix. He needs to lighten up on the nastiness- don't scold people for doing their already difficult job, how would he treat himself ion he ever appeared before someone like him while in private practice?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY10800
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Constantly and unnecessarily nasty. Goes out of his way to harangue and embarrass attorneys at nearly every calendar call. God forbid you refer to an independent medical examination as an "IME" instead of a "defense physical". You will get a lengthy irate lecture on why there is nothing independent about it. Clear plaintiff bias.