Hon. Andrew A. Crecca See Rating Details

County Court
Suffolk County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.5 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Andrew A. Crecca


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9541
Judge Crecca does have Bias views of fathers due to a radical advocacy in Halt program .I recommend to any farther to stay away from this judge.He claims to be a republican but is truly a closet liberal democrat and a feminist that favors any women's opinion over a man


Comment #: NY9430
Judge Crecca is the definition of "The Lawyer who does not know the Law". He doesn't know the law but since he is the God in his room, he need not know human laws.


Comment #: NY3840
Disparaging comments made about a parent to her child. Doesn't recuse himself when defendant's council is 2nd largest contributor to his election campaign. "I am not inclined to award child support arrears" he tells the mother. Shows surprise on the bench when the abuser tells the court he hasn't seen his kids in over a year....they have orders of protection against him. His clerk sits in the jury chairs sleeping, making faces in favor of the plaintiff and nods in agreement with the abuser. The judge doesn't even listen to testimony, claiming he can do more than one thing at a time, mid-trial. No regard for the children's best interests, can go on and on.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY3836
Not one single thing about Crecca's courtroom is fair. He treats the batterer as a hero and continues to batter the abused spouse. In today's world, when children are told they will be protected from an abuser if they tell someone in authority, Judge Crecca gives the exact opposite message, go for therapy and learn to deal with the abusive parent, otherwise you will grow up to be an alcoholic or drug addict. But, the abusive parent, even after CPS confirms abuse, doesn't have to do a thing, and the custodial parent is threatened with contempt for not dragging the unwilling kids to see their abuser. This is a frightening courtroom presided over by a judge who used to be a law guardian.


Comment #: NY1742
Finally- a judge who "gets it"! He's not afraid to take a stand and do what is in a child's best interest. He takes his time and listens to witnesses, as well as the court appointed experts.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY577
A weak judge. Not sure if he ever tried a case before he went on the bench. Weak on the law and sides with the prosecution to protect himself. Not sure who gave him the high rating. Maybe a relative. Another political appointment who lacked the qualifications to be a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY187
Great judge!