Hon. Randall T. Eng See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Randall T. Eng


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY219
Rating:6.6
Comments:
Justice Eng is an nice enough man off the bench, which makes it all the more confusing as to why he is such a miserable person on the bench. It is one thing to be conservative, it is quite another to be demanding, rude and dictatorial. Judge Eng thinks that a trial is a giant steamroller with himself as the driver. He will run over anybody or anything that gets in the way of his making standards and goals. He also is completely unconcerned with the rights of the defendant. He is about getting to what he thinks is the right answer (usually guilty) and not a thing about doing it according to the law. It's too bad, too, because he is smart, he just does not understand that justice is the goal and the standard. Everything else is just form over substance.