Hon. Kathryn E. Freed See Rating Details

Supreme Court (Civil)
New York County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Kathryn E. Freed


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY12590
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I AM ANI M MIHRANIAN, I SUED MY 1982 EMPLOYER FOR FALSIFYING MY SHORT TERM DISABILITY AND STEALING MY CAR ACCIDENT 8 BROKEN BONES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. I WON ONE MILLION DOLLARS DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AFTER I SIGNED IT AND GAVE IT TO HON. JUDGE KATHRYN E. FREED SECRETARY, SHE DISMISSED MY LAWSUIT AND UNTIL NOW THE MANHATTAN SUPREME COURT DOES NOT GIVE ME BACK MY ONE MILLION DOLLARS DEFAT JUDGMENT SIGNED PAPERS BACK. I SUED AS PROSE. PLEASE CALL ME AND EMAIL ME TO GIVE ME BACK MY ONE MILLION DOLLARS SIGNED DEFAULT JUDGMENT PAPERS BACK. THIS HAPPENED IN 2018, NOW IT IS NOVEMBER 15, 2021 STILL I DID NOT GET MY SIGNED ONE MILLION DOLLARS DEFAULT JUDGMENT SIGNED PAPERS BACK. KENSORGERAS@GMAIL.COM MY CELL PHONE 2019486111
THANK YOU
ANI M MIHRANIAN

Other

Comment #: NY12106
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She completely ignores basic law. She lets her clerk make the decisions, does not even meet with attorneys most of the time. She is not even aware of her own court rules.he has no business being a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9694
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ignorant of the law. Relies upon her newly-graduated law clerk to make decisions.

Litigant

Comment #: NY5530
Rating:2.0
Comments:
As an acting supreme court judge she is very indecisive and prefers deferring to counsel for answers and suggestions. Prolongs even the simplest procedures.
Even mentioned (while on the bench) that she often works until midnight which is perhaps an indication that she is not ready for "prime-time."
Seems more concerned with her election bid for Supreme Court than doing a through and balanced job as an acting Supreme Court judge.