Hon. Darrell L. Gavrin See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Darrell L. Gavrin


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7413
A very experienced jurist

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY5554
She is clueless doesn't know the Law. Just appealed her stupid decision the panel was laughing at her. So a motion goes back to her and she gets upset so she punishes the winner.


Comment #: NY2600
Rating:Not Rated
Political interference in the work of this judge has become a matter of grave concern because her judicial decisions lack legal basis and appear to be decided to force exclusive outcomes.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1578
I agree with the prior poster to the extent she's wrong on the law. My main issue is her judicial temperament which is horrific.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY825
Wrong on the law. Desperately tries to settle cases just so juries won't non-suit plaintiff. Will bully the litigant who won't play ball with her.