Hon. John G. Ingram See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.4 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. John G. Ingram


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12597
Rating:2.3
Comments:
This guy plays to whoever is in power. He has no spine. Gives a fake rap about the military - like he's a great patriot. Ganged up on the defendant in a highly publicized case. Came out looking like a hero. Truth was he sided with the media view of the case, as well as his then chief administrative judge (later forced to retire due to unethical collusion with the boro DA [and a defense lawyer whom held a lot of sway with the boro DA]. Don't know if the fires in hell could ever be made hot enough for this scoundrel.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY9009
Rating:8.8
Comments:
Ingram recently replaced Diana Johnson as Surrogate. He clearly has done his homework and is fully up to speed with the somewhat arcane and archaic rules of the Surrogate's Court. He is pleasant and respectful to counsel and parties. A real gentleman on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY670
Rating:7.9
Comments:
Just came back from his sentencing my client. There were no surprises. He called us up to the bench in advance to confirm the terms of the agreed-upon sentence. After a favorable PSR, he imposed the agreed-upon sentence. He's decent, polite, smart and evenhanded.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY438
Rating:5.0
Comments:
Seems to run a tight ship. I just had a pretrial appearance before him and held a tight rein on a lawyer who was giving him double-talk.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY287
Rating:7.8
Comments:
I had an arraignment before him in a multiple defendant Medicaid Fraud case and he acted professionally in seeing that each defendant was speedily arraigned and released that day. Although the A.G.'s office did a less than mediocre bail presentation for a few defendants considered flight risks, the judge considered the defense (also less than mediocre) arguments and released the defendant for 24 hours to post bail the next day. If I had known he was amendable to giving defendants time to post, I wouldn't have had the clients run around getting funds at the last minute. I hope my pretrial and trial experience before this judge is as pleasurable as the arraignment. So, for the next attorney at an arraignment on disputed bail, I'd take a shot before Judge Ingram at arguing for a reduced bail, rather than accept the number the People propose.