Hon. Sandra L. Sgroi See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Suffolk County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sandra L. Sgroi


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NY2413
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge is an idiot, she sat in divorce court and did a number on me and my children, she did not care about the facts of the case, endangered my chidren, acted like she was in bed with my then husband's attorney brother and when the facts starred her in the face and she looked like an idiot she recused herself, after we had been asking her for months to do so. Definitley paid-off, NO ONE IS THAT DUMB!!! I would not let her make a decision about a plant much less anything else, who was the idiot who took her to the Appellate court. NOW THAT IS A CASE OF DUMBER AND DUMBER!!!

Litigant

Comment #: NY2412
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge is an idiot, she sat in divorce court and did a number on me and my children, she did not care about the facts of the case, endangered my chidren, acted like she was in bed with my then husband's attorney brother and when the facts starred her in the face and she looked like an idiot she recused herself, after we had been asking her for months to do so. Definitley paid-off, NO ONE IS THAT DUMB!!! I would not let her make a decision about a plant much less anything else, who was the idiot who took her to the Appellate court. NOW THAT IS A CASE OF DUMBER AND DUMBER!!!

Other

Comment #: NY1049
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ignores the statutes when it suits her. regularly lets the fiduciaries she appoints get away with NOT filing mandated paperwork with the fiduciary clerk and the OCA .
Does not comply with rules of chief judge.
This judge needs a full time babysitter , there is NO oversight from what I have witnessed. I am not speaking of just one isolated case.