Hon. Susan M. Capeci See Rating Details

County Court
Westchester County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Susan M. Capeci


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9429
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Observation is that, before Judge Capeci, defendants are presumed guilty and she is biased and punitive. No even-handedness whatsoever particularly if a minority is before her. She significantly reduces the quality of the bench and is not qualified to handle custody matters. Regrettably, the only losers are the children. The IDV part should be dissolved if this is the best jurist on the bench.

Other

Comment #: NY6080
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She picks and chooses who she likes and who she doesn't whether they listen to her orders or not. She's extremely moody you never know what mood she'll be in she one minute she is as sweet as can be and the next time she can be arrogant screaming and yelling even at the attorneys. She tends to make false promises goes back on her word and does whatever she feels at the moment. She's a horrible person.