Hon. Betty Owen Stinson See Rating Details

Supreme Court (Civil)
Bronx County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.5 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Betty Owen Stinson


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7388
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
*RATE A BRONX JUDGE*

RATE JUDGE #BETTY OWEN STINSON# *F for FAILING*

Comment #: NY7386
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7385
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7383
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Corrupt Judge Betty Owen STINSON leads to the death of 31 year young RICARDO RIVERA. This Judge should be under a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION !!!!!!

BECAUSE CORRUPT/EVIL JUDGE BETTY OWEN STINSON #BRONX, NY# MADE A CHILD ABUSER RICARDO RIVERA'S GUARDIAN AND SENTENCED RICARDO JOSE RIVERA AT 31 YEARS OF AGE TO A LIFE SENTENCE IN AN INSTITUTE (WITHOUT DUE PROCESS) WHEN HE ONLY WENT INTO JACOBI MEDICAL CENTER WITH A PASSING GALL STONE - IN THE MIDDLE OF HIS HIGHER EDUCATION STUDIES....AND NOW HE IS DEAD!!!!! *SHE IS PURE EVIL* !!!!

#JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT#

#JUDICIAL CORRUPTION#

#BRONX# #NYS#

#FEDERAL PROSECUTOR#

#CORRUPT JUDGE#

JUDGE BETTY OWEN STINSON WAS CHARGED BY THE FLORIDA BAR ASSOCIATION WITH MISCONDUCT AND SHOULD BE BY THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; FURTHERMORE, IN MY OPINION - A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR SHOULD PUT HER BEHIND BARS!

GO AHEAD AND DELETE IT; YOU CAN NOT DELETE MY PRAYERS FOR JUSTICE !!!!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7386
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7385
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7383
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Corrupt Judge Betty Owen STINSON leads to the death of 31 year young RICARDO RIVERA. This Judge should be under a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION !!!!!!

BECAUSE CORRUPT/EVIL JUDGE BETTY OWEN STINSON #BRONX, NY# MADE A CHILD ABUSER RICARDO RIVERA'S GUARDIAN AND SENTENCED RICARDO JOSE RIVERA AT 31 YEARS OF AGE TO A LIFE SENTENCE IN AN INSTITUTE (WITHOUT DUE PROCESS) WHEN HE ONLY WENT INTO JACOBI MEDICAL CENTER WITH A PASSING GALL STONE - IN THE MIDDLE OF HIS HIGHER EDUCATION STUDIES. *SHE IS PURE EVIL* !!!!

Other

Comment #: NY7385
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7383
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Corrupt Judge Betty Owen STINSON leads to the death of 31 year young RICARDO RIVERA. This Judge should be under a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION !!!!!!


*REPOSTED* IT WAS DELETED !!!!

Other

Comment #: NY7377
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am in agreement with all the ones deleted as well as the two below.

Other

Comment #: NY7318
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH THE POST BELOW!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7229
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: NY7227
Rating:Rated #1
Comments: Revised
I was wondering how Justice Betty Owen-Stinson established a 3.5 rating; until I noticed many criminal lawyer's rated her with one star, that lead their rating to be deleted.
Who is responsible for the deletions in here? It certainly reflects badly on the entire Supreme Court in the Bronx. May the new year bring back integrity to the bench, that this judge took away from it.

Litigant

Comment #: NY7160
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is a shill for the defense bar. Plaintiff attorneys get hammered before her regularly.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7148
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Criminal Defense Lawyer
Comment #: NY7142
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Comment #: NY7137
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In a civil case the burden of proof is by a preponderence of the evidence, while in a criminal case the state's persuasion burden is met only by proof beyond a reasonable doubt 397 U.S. 358, 361. Lugubriously enough in Justice Owen-Stinson cases; weither it be a civil or criminal case, there is no acquiescence of evidence from the defense unless Justice Owen-Stinson is working in their behalf. Justice Owen-Stinson makes her rulings prior to trial with the Plaintiff or Defendant (whomever SHE represents). [Redacted by Editor] Furthermore, he has no Courtroom etiquette.

Following this forum I noticed negative rating's on Justice Owen-Stinson often get deleted such as a case against the NYPD in criminal court before Justice Owen-Stinson. That is no surprise; evidence also disappears in Justice Owen-Stinson cases or not allowed. Due process is OBSOLETE in Justice Owen-Stinson cases, replaced with sham hearings for the Party she is working with PRIOR to a trial. Justice Owen-Stinson should be disbarred and removed from the bench.

**REPOSTING MY COMMENT FOR THE THIRD TIME; THAT WAS DELETED**

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY7128
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Two words:

Crazy lady.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY6549
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Justice Owen-Stinson is uninterested in the law and would prefer not to be bothered with a discussion of precedent or statute. Despite myriad citation to binding law on the issue before her, the Judge was uninterested in following the same. Was disrespectful to the moving counsel, rolling her eyes and making dismissive and disruptive gestures and noises while argument was ongoing. Shocked when attorney called her on it. Plainly biased pro defense and plainly unconcerned with following the law. Terrible judicial temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY5615
Rating:9.9
Comments:
Great and learned judge.

Litigant

Comment #: NY3800
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Un-Honorable Judge Betty Owen Stinson is one of the most despicable persons I have ever met, in my entire life on this earth. In my opinion she has no values or conscience, she is incompetent, she is vengeful, abuses her power, and creates havoc in our judicial system. In my opinion she actually is a disgrace to those honorable Judges that sit at the bench, and go by the law. From what I have seen of Ms. Stinson; she does not respect or go by the Constitution of the United States, and goes by her own rules. Apparently "due process" is not a word in her vocabulary, nor does she adhere to it. She appears to have no respect for anyone, including the law. She has been cited allegedly for misconduct in Florida, from my understanding by the Florida Bar. I believe she carried over the same behavior to the New York Courts. I honestly believe she had endangered at least one person’s life, by her erroneous, bias, unlawful if not illegal Orders/Judgments, and nothing but a criminal that has not paid her debt to society for her crimes. Until I met her, I have had respect and honored every person in our legal system. Quite honestly, there is only one Judge Stinson, and thank God we do not have more like her, making decisions in our Court Rooms. I am not sure if she just does not comprehend the law, she thinks she is above the law, or if she is just out and out corrupt; and in time will get caught and reprimanded in the State of New York - as she allegedly was reprimanded in the State of Florida for misconduct. Hopefully, when her term ends in 2013, she will no longer cause any more pain, suffering, and hardships in her "victims" lives - and she can be replaced with another one of the honorable judges, that New York is proud to have presiding in our Court System.

Respectfully, one that had endured so very much pain and suffering due to this women and her sham hearing. Honestly I find it hard to believe she is behind the bench making any kind of decision. In my opinion, she is just not qualified to be behind the bench, in “any” Court room – or she is just out and out corrupt to the bone, and should be indicted. Tax payers deserve more than this kind of person behind the bench. And litigants deserve a fair hearing/trial. 09/25/2012