Hon. Sidney F. Strauss See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sidney F. Strauss


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY2572
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Sidney F. Strauss of the Queens Supreme Court has just shown himself to be insensitive to consequences of his decisions, and easily manipulated by those trying to manipulate the judicial process. There are 2 disputing parties trying to control the Board at my condo. I am not a member of either group, but as an owner, was looking forward to our upcoming Annual Meeting to clear the air and accomplish needed business. But one of the parties filed with the courts, and Strauss's decision was to order a postponement of the Annual Owners Meeting a week, on 8 days notice, right in the middle of December. The second party requested a longer extension, due to the short notice and busy holiday season, which Strauss denied. It is likely there will be no reasonable or productive outcome of this forced-change meeting, because attendance will be impacted by the poor timing. Strauss played into the hands of those hoping to manipulate the process of a legitimate meeting, and made it harder for our community to problem solve.

Other

Comment #: NY1350
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A tough but essentially fair guy. Hates
motion practice and discovery. Has exceptional court staff.