Hon. Paul Ryneski See Rating Details

JHO/Support Magistrates
New York County
See Comments
New York City

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Paul Ryneski


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NY11053
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Excellent. Appeared to made decisions based on findings of facts and not personal opinion or according to his mood of the day like the other judges. Asked questions and allowed me time to explain.

Other

Comment #: NY7685
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This guy is an absolute disgrace as a Judge. He is a very one sided Judge and makes it clear that he is all for ripping the non custodial parent off, for lack of a better way to put it. He doesnt even pretend. He shows clearly that he will rip you off at all cost. What a bad "judge"

Litigant

Comment #: NY6999
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ryneski was terrible. His first decision was reversed by the judge on objection and after his second decision the judge remanded matters to a different support magistrate for a different support magistrate in part because of his inability to hold a proper fact finding trial and his inability to issue a reasoned and supported opinion.

Other

Comment #: NY3653
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Do not listen just one sided