Hon. Cheryl Weir-Reeves See Rating Details

JHO/Support Magistrates
New York County
See Comments
New York City

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Cheryl Weir-Reeves


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NY5052
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I agree with the above posts. Support Magistrate Cheryl Weir-Reeves is totally out of control and routinely abuses her position.

Like in your situation, she also tampered with my file to remove and throw out evidence that was useful to show that I was a good father and that I paid my child support, she would verbally abuse me on the record, she would motion to her court officers to physically surround and intimidate me when she wanted to terrorize me, and she also would never let me speak, interrupting me throughout, even when she asked me questions.

She has a serious anger management problem, and only writes down what she wants to hear, and butchers your words and changes them to mean something else for her legal opinions.

She is an arch-feminist and African-American bully, belonging 100% to feminist and LGBT special interest groups (they use her because she is a black woman and can therefore get away with being racist, sexist, unethical, and unfair), and she gets off by harassing and terrorizing men, and the problem is, she gets away with it because the NY Family Court is a star chamber that is closed off to the public.

I have spoken to several federal and local law enforcement officers, and it appears that she is already under the microscope and is being investigated by several different federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, and is about to be criminally indicted soon for rampant corruption and chronic abuse of her position on the bench in the Moreland Commission investigation.

She routinely violates the U.S. and New York State Constitutions in her witch hunt against good fathers, and the U.S. Government is well aware of this.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY4777
Rating:1.3
Comments:
I think that she's malicious and capricious. She has no idea of what a good father is. She is awfully disrespectful towards men.

Litigant

Comment #: NY2256
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This woman has a big problem, She needs to withdraw her view of men and start treating us father with more respect. I understand there are fathers that has it coming to them.It seems to me that she put us all in the same boat.