Hon. Nancy Bannon See Rating Details

Civil Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.8 - 10 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Nancy Bannon


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NY8260
Rating:1.0
Comments:
WORST JUDGE IN NY SUPREME COURT

Other

Comment #: NY8123
Rating:10.0
Comments:
An excellent judge with a remarkable work ethic and judicial temperament!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY8122
Rating:1.0
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] I had filed a personal suit against her from a matter where she owed a debt, prior to becoming a judge, and when I drew her on an Order to Show Cause she made me wait 5.5 hours and then refused to recuse herself, all the while glaring at me

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7749
Rating:8.9
Comments:
Hardworking, intelligent and thoughtful. She is a force to be reckoned with, in the most positive sense.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7681
Rating:8.1
Comments:
Justice Bannon was highly engaged, obviously smart and prepared, and treated all counsel with respect, giving everyone a chance to make points and counterpoints.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7503
Rating:1.4
Comments:
A poor judicial temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7251
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Need retraining in the CPLR and in civility to lawyers.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7050
Rating:2.0
Comments:
A bullying judicial temperament coupled with an unwillingness to listen to or consider legal arguments for the other side.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY6932
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Not "evenhanded" combined with poor judicial temperment.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY5810
Rating:8.0
Comments:
I am surprised at the other comments - I thought she was a good trial judge. A listener, and very thoughtful. She cut short my cross-examination of a doctor, and, after initially being miffed, I realized I had gone on way too long. I deserved it. D'oh!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY5558
Rating:2.4
Comments:
Not a smart judge at all. She has no concept of the law.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY5376
Rating:2.6
Comments:
Her courtroom staff are more thoughtful than she is.