Hon. Leticia Ramirez See Rating Details

Family Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Leticia Ramirez


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY8759
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Judge Ramirez was a civil judge at the Harlem Community Justice Center in 2015, when I appeared before her often her in eviction proceedings, on behalf of tenants. She did not read the briefs, did not take oral argument, her decisions were not well written or researched, and she was absolutely pro-landlord in every case. She seems to have an extreme bias against poor people and women.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY8665
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Judge Ramirez showed zero interest in reading the briefs and finding out what the case was really about. Pro-defendant dispositions based on generalized recitals of the law and in blatant ignorance of the evidence before her. Absolutely unacceptable standards for a judge on this court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY7598
Rating:2.4
Comments:
A shill for Defendants

Litigant

Comment #: NY7103
Rating:4.0
Comments:
This judge is prejudicial and I find that affects her her outcome of fair findings in her cases.