Hon. Steven M. Statsinger See Rating Details

Criminal Court
New York County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Steven M. Statsinger


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY9377
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I was in Statsinger's Court today and Statsinger committed fraud upon a defendant. The defendant was originally charged with 4 misdemeanors. The defendant asked to be represented by a lawyer even though the defendant is eligible for an HB lawyer. Statsinger refused to allow defendant to have a lawyer and forced him into trial unrepresented. The all of the prosecutor's witnesses lied about what was said and what was heard. The defendant was forced by Statsinger to cross examined the witnesses... on the day of the trial the prosecutor filed a Prosecutor's Information with one of the charge different that the previous charges. The defendant protest by his protest fell on deaf ear. The new charge was Penal Law 240.20 (1) that was never part of the original charge. He asked for discovery on this new charge and Statsinger refused defendant request. is this New Charge on the "Prosecutor's information" handed to the defendant on December 4, 2017 discovery material?

Other

Comment #: NY8959
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A Horrible Judge Should be sue. Judge Statsinger is extremely Pro-prosecution. Aweful