Hon. Danny Chun See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.3 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Danny Chun


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY13650
Rating:9.6
Comments:
while he may lean towards the prosecution, Judge Chun is a fair man that holds no grudges. He also treats all defendants fairly. He is also extremely hard-working, insightful, and honest. He is having an admirable career and is a distinguished civil servant.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY12768
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Nasty and biased towards crooked D.A s out to gain from inflicting misery onto defendants that are innocent by ignoring exornerating evidence. The Giuca hearing outcome feb 2022 is just one example. He made remarks that of a thicko and smacked of low I.Q to justify ignoring evidence of Giucas innocence. He should be sacked. A danger to the public safety