Hon. Ingrid Joseph See Rating Details

Civil Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.5 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Ingrid Joseph


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13366
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unfortunately she learned nothing about how to treat people as she's gone through life and when she clerked for J. Partnow. She's stubborn, makes decisions as if she has various templates in front of her while ruling, and can get real nasty. A provincial minded simpleton. But, thank goodness she makes the racial quota. lol.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY13348
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Waited all morning for in person argument to no avail. The judge never showed. Finally had oral argument another day- the judge thought it better to decide admittedly "meritless case" on what she said was "a legal technicality" than administer justice. Sad, but her decision will be appealed and should be overturned.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9669
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Tried a case before her last year. She is thorough, polite, professional and knowledgable. She belongs in Supreme.