Hon. Ulysses B. Leverett See Rating Details

Civil Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Ulysses B. Leverett


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12827
Rating:2.3
Comments:
The post of 3/22/22 is spot on. Evident bias. No consideration of case law. Why bother submitting it?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY12796
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Typical Queens judge and staff -- can't handle complex fact patterns, so just kicks the can down the road through a blanket denial of summary judgment which reveals that the motion papers were just skimmed over. The judge seems to rely on his underqualified, inexperienced clerks to handle motions and issue decisions, and they are invariably incorrect and even internally inconsistent. Set aside part of your litigation budget to appeal.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY11852
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Totally clueless.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY10262
Rating:4.8
Comments:
The Part does not run efficiently on motion days