"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Hon. George R. Peck	See Rating Details
Supreme Court
Nassau County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.8 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. George R. Peck

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: NY9836
Rating:1.0

Comments:
The rating scale should start from -10 instead of 0 precisely for this reason.

A random individual selected off of the street has better sense of right from wrong than this sorry name of a judge.

According to his rulings, truth, facts, evidence or otherwise are meaningless. He closes his eyes on all and rules in Plaintiff’s favor regardless

I WANT TO KNOW HOW IN THE WORLD HE IS STILL A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND WHY MY TAX MONEY IS PAYING HIS SALARY?!!!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9746
Rating:1.0

Comments:
A disgrace. Took four months to make a decision on a simple motion and apparently didn't read the pleadings or the motion.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY8915
Rating:2.5

Comments:
It is a shame that this man is paid by tax payer dollars. Other than sucking oxygen from the room, he served no purpose during the trial. He was openly favorable to my adversary admitting that he knew him for 30 years, yet refusing to recuse himself. The issues were not complex, yet Judge Peck refused to listen to or consider any law. Members of the bar who spend countless hours preparing for a trial and the litigants who pay tens of thousands of dollars for that service deserve more than a judge of this low intellectual caliber. Judge Peck should be demoted to traffic court, a venue that suits his proven abilities.