Hon. Deborah Poulos See Rating Details

Family Court
Suffolk County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Deborah Poulos


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY11699
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge. Totally disregarded the hard evidence on the case and made biased remarks about the plaintiff. Completely ignored defendants self incriminating remarks on the stand as well.

Other

Comment #: NY11698
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge. Totally disregarded the hard evidence on the case and made biased about the plaintiff. Completely ignored defendants self incriminating remarks on the stand as well.

Other

Comment #: NY10708
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She get right to the point of the problem and enforces signed agreements. Thank god for judges like her not tying up the courts with everyone’s BS move the cases along great job

Other

Comment #: NY10704
Rating:1.0
Comments:
What an embarrassment to the bench. She seems to believe she's in a Judge Judy episode. It's laughable. She does not care about the case, but rather likes to embarrass parties and counsel and hear herself talk. She sounds uneducated when she speaks. I have never seen a judge so disinterested in the facts. She appears to have only this - nothing outside the court house - just an aging sad lonely woman. I actually feel sorry for her, but stay away if you can.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY10550
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Did not want to be bother with the case, and told her staff to hand case off to a different judge by advising that she was not at work that day even though she was in her chambers. Look for reasons to dispose of cases quickly without any thought as to the litigants