Hon. Julia I. Rodriguez See Rating Details

Supreme Court (Civil)
Bronx County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Julia I. Rodriguez


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY12237
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Based decision entirely upon Her sui sponte determination of fact after a Summary Judgment Motion was fully submitted.

The factual determination itself (above) was prompted by the court's reading of the contract clause at issue whereby the first 7 words of the clause were omitted to force the remaining text to express the exact opposite meaning of the original/full text of the contract.

The type of reasoning I would expect from a 10 year old.

As noted above, Summary Judgment motions are not for factual determinations.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11213
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Joke- total defense judge, clearly jealous and fails to comprehend the law, clearly never actually worked as a lawyer

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY11095
Rating:9.9
Comments:
The most pleasant judge before whom I have ever tried a case. She is very fair with rulings and smart. A very good assignment!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY9469
Rating:10.0
Comments:
An outstanding judge. She is pleasant, professional and knowledgeable. Always a pleasure to appear in her courtroom.