Hon. Elizabeth H. Emerson See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Suffolk County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Elizabeth H. Emerson


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY13326
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Still waiting for my case to be put on a calendar date since 2016. Who oversees judges performance in NY State? It’s unfair and a disgrace. She is wasting tax payers’ money by sitting in her position.

Other

Comment #: NY9704
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I been advised that Judge Emerson's favors those with voting rights within the district. While a judge is to conduct a trial impartially and expeditiously. Judge Emerson did neither. A true travesty of justice.

Other

Comment #: NY7567
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Facts were there. She went in the other direction because she knew of someone who knew the person involved.I guess thats just the way it works. You have taken food from a childs mouth. Very sad Ms. Emerson.
RE:Bonanni case, you didn't follow the law. Very sad.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1448
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Top notch. Very bright. Very professional. Very tolerant. Flat-out great judge.