Hon. Rolando T. Acosta See Rating Details

Supreme Court (Civil)
New York County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.4 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Rolando T. Acosta


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY4853
Rating:1.9
Comments:
He makes his decisions based on class and race. He makes decisions based on his sympathies, instead of with reference to the law. He should be more objective. He is not what one hopes for in a judge. He was a big disappointment. But, if you are the right shade of color and a member of the right economic class, he is definitely the judge for you.

Litigant

Comment #: NY1973
Rating:7.0
Comments:
I've had him once on appeal of an adverse ruling by S.Ct. judge. He exhibited common sense and a sense of fairness.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY1245
Rating:8.6
Comments:
I don't know how the other rater (there is only one as I write)encountered him. I have had him on three cases, one of which was terribly complex. He reads what you write, he takes notes, he listens. He has common sense and a sense of what is right. What more can you ask of a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY538
Rating:2.9
Comments:
This guy could barely speak English. Now he's on the Appellate Division. Go figure!