Hon. Diana Johnson See Rating Details

Supreme Court
Kings (Brooklyn) County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Diana Johnson


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY3222
Rating:1.0
Comments:
There is nothing good to say about this Judge. Nothing at all. A huge disaster. She is too angry and bitter.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY2622
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Her actions as Surrogate show that she does not like attorneys. However, by punishing attorneys, she also punishes our clients. Her rulings are contradictory, she requires pointless motion practice that no other surrogate requires (in order to show how busy she is, but with easily-decided motions). I believe she requires stupid, pointless motions to be made, for the sole purpose that they can be decided quickly. This balances out the other motions that she takes forever to decide.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY1262
Rating:7.5
Comments:
She started off as Surrogate with some bumps. However, she is clearly the better Surrogate in Brooklyn. Overall, it seems she will be good - especially compared to her counterpart (Loopey Lopez Torres) who is nutty.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY480
Rating:6.4
Comments:
Pro-defendant; however, she will switch sides if a defendant plays dirty.