Hon. Robert D. Kalish See Rating Details

Civil Court
Queens County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Robert D. Kalish


Comments


Other

Comment #: NY1695
Rating:10.0
Comments:
An excellent judge. Fair, and treats everyone in his court room with the utmost respect.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NY950
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A great judge. A better person.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY506
Rating:6.8
Comments:
While evenhanded in his rulings he interrupts far too much during the course of a trial. Any experienced litigator knows that in direct testimony there are areas that are deliberately avoided. His questions tend to go too far into the area of cross examination - touching on those skipped areas and sometimes waking up your adversary. Judge, listen to what is elicited from the attorneys and then make your decision on the evidence presented. You involve yourself too much.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NY116
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Despite his background with corporation counsel, he is not as defendant oriented as you would think.