"The Robing Room: NY State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Rosalie Bailey

Comments

Other

Comment #: NY12561
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Not professional, knows nothing about how to read a summons, or complaint. Evil, vile, and a threat to the justice system. Don't put your children's future in her court, stay away!

Other

Comment #: NY3151
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge is whacked and senile! Her decisions are based on her feelings of you and not the testimonies presented in front of her. Witnesses testified at two separate trials in the 1st trial only the psychologist paid for by the courts testified on the petitioners behalf and she ruled in his favor. That 1st trial had 6 witnesses total including me the respondent, who she made come to court only 10 days after her baby was born and I had to nurse my son on the witness stand! She said she did not like my demeanor. Well who would be comfortable with a crying baby, nursing, and he peed on me on top of it all while I was on the witness stand. Plus I was still bleeding! Then second trial all 3 witnesses had nothing but good things to say about me and she still sided with the petitioner. So now my daughter is only worthy of 1 hour a week supervised at an agency for the next 11 years!!!! If you have this judge RUN!!! WITHDRAW YOUR PETITIONS!!! She will ruin your children!!!