Hon. D. Fred Doak See Rating Details
Special Judge
Court
Oklahoma County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.9 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. D. Fred Doak


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK1632
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Great and fair Judge!

Other

Comment #: OK1631
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge and I use the title loosely is terrible. I filed for a protective order for harassment. The judge did not allow me to finish a single sentence, refused to even look at my documents showing the harassment and literally wrote the word "NO" on a post-it note and put it in front of me and said I needed to learn how to use that word. If the person accepted "NO" it wouldn't be harassment!! I finally just lifted up my records toward his face and flipped through it showing the relentless harassment. These records definitely got his attention and his tone got stern with the defendant and threated him to not contact me again or there would be a PO but he had already made his ruling known and wasn't going to admit he was wrong. So how it is if he contacts me again it is harassment but the year of harassment before that meant nothing. His job is to hear cases, review the evidence and make a fair ruling based on the information. He failed miserable on all three.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK1444
Rating:3.7
Comments:
I fully agree with the prior comment that this Judge seems to look for opportunities to be rude. In my opinion, any Judge who displays the kind of behavior I have observed coming from this Judge has aptly demonstrated himself to be both unqualified for and unworthy of the bench.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: OK396
Rating:4.7
Comments:
This judge seems to look for opportunities to be rude.