Hon. Noma D. Gurich See Rating Details
District Judge
Court
Oklahoma County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.2 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Noma D. Gurich


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK543
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
NOT WORTH RATING. IF YOU ARE FROM A LARGE FIRM, YOU ARE GOOD TO GO. OTHERWISE, BEND OVER.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK533
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Sometimes very bizzare evidentiary decisions.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK414
Rating:9.3
Comments:
I read the other comments, and I was stunned. Maybe I'm a favorite, but I've only been before her a couple of times, and I don't know her personally, so I don't think that's it. She did a very nice job with a complex litigation matter I had before her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK401
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Extremely biased as personal relationships matter a great deal. Her complete lack of knowledge regarding basic legal principals is astounding.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK388
Rating:3.4
Comments:
She seems to decide matters on whether she knows and likes the attorneys. She is afraid to grant summary judgments, even when they clearly should be granted. Very liberal on discovery. Once during a trial after our very qualified expert had gone through his background, we took a recess. In chambers, she made a point of saying, "Your expert's really full of himself, isn't he?"

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK332
Rating:5.0
Comments:
She allows personal relationships to impact her decisions.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK90
Rating:2.3
Comments:
She lacks the ability to read and understand basic law.