Hon. Charles Gray See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Court
McClain County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.1 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Charles Gray


Comments


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: OK2281
Rating:2.3
Comments:
Unable to keep clarity. Fails to research thoroughly and is easily swayed on decisions previously ruled. Fails to hear both sides of case, yet still makes a ruling. I am a defendant who was never heard for a case lasting 15 years. AS others, my dismissal was scribbled out the day before court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK2160
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Again, Judge Gray has denied our day in court without hearing the case - again.
He e-mailed a "stay" on a scribbled, very
hard to read memo" the night before our hearing was to begin next morning.
This is not justice.
Water is Life

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK2090
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Gray is a thoughtful and considerate judge. I’ve seen him take the time to express kindness to litigants in difficult situations, even when the litigant isn’t getting what they are requesting from the court. He’s even tempered and makes logical decisions well grounded in the facts and law applicable to the case.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK1961
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Coming from a long standing legal family, I was totally underwhelmed by the "lack of knowledge or interest" in my case..."did not need to read it". This was a LEGITIMATE CASE that we and our attorneys had spent 3 years following all the state guidelines and presentations necessary for the Judge to completely understand what had happened. Judge Gray did not even read the case. What an insult to right and wrong. I am a Native American Elder and I expect to be treated with respect even if your ruling is not for me. I am highly offended. I am a retired surgery nurse/social worker and I am an educated person and I expect him to do what is right by me even if it is reading the evidence resented by my attorneys, Travis Pickens, Hank Meyer, Phil Watts and Dean Couch. To scribble on a piece of paper that no one could read is simply unacceptable.
I want my day in court. I am a tax payer. I will file a formal complaint against his behavior on the bench.
He is rude, bombastic, dismissive to attorneys even before they have been allotted their "five" minutes before him. Totally unacceptable. Susie Purcell, Age 80, A Native American Elder. Even Assoc. Judge Gray has a boss. We pay his salary and in my opinion right now - it is money wasted.
The Rule of Law is what I expect to be followed. READ WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO YOU. LOOK AT A SURVEY AGREED UPON BY BOTH PARTIES, THEN RENDER YOUR DECISION. NOT ONE SECOND BEFORE.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK1944
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He ruled on a case before having "heard" the case. This is very disturbing to me, an 80 year old Chickasaw Elder. It was a pure "theft" case that he chose not to hear. Not the kind of ruling that I expected because our family is long standing legal professionals in the State of Oklahoma. Hand wrote the "dismissal" that was hardly legible. Disgusting. Rude.