Hon. Linda G. Morrissey See Rating Details
District Judge
Court
Tulsa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.3 - 9 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Linda G. Morrissey


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK1237
Rating:1.6
Comments:
She is simply the laziest and most ineffectual judge that I've ever experienced. She will not seriously consider any significant motions, and has cost litigants in single cases hundreds of thousands of dollars in unnecessary fees and expenses by refusing to grant obvious MSJs. She pushes litigants to hire special masters to recommend decisions because she isn't smart enough or industrious enough to do it herself. Someone -- anyone -- needs to run against this joke of a judge in the next election. She is an embarrassment.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK1181
Rating:8.9
Comments:
I had two extended and complicated civil matters before her and she handled both professionally and even-handedly. I would be pleased to try a civil action before her.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK596
Rating:5.9
Comments:
While she is very smart, she seems to get her mind made up early and it is difficult to budge her. Seems a bit plaintiff oriented.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK562
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She has to be one of the worst judges in the County. Fails to read motions, or simply fails to understand the issues and refuses to educate herself. Has a major attitude, and clearly plays favorites. Needs to be removed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK552
Rating:1.6
Comments:
Makes no effort to read, understand or follow the law.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OK229
Rating:1.7
Comments:
The fact that she never practiced law shows every time that she takes the bench. She fails to understand that she is constrained by the Oklahoma Statutes.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK21
Rating:9.6
Comments:
Very knowledgeable of the law - and she applies it evenhandedly to real life situations that appear in her court room. She takes time to listen to both sides.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: OK17
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Horrible, stupid and lazy. But good at running for office.