Hon. Ulanda L. Watkins See Rating Details
Circuit Court Judge
Circuit Court
Clackamas County
Judicial District 5
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Ulanda L. Watkins


Comments


Other

Comment #: OR605
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Listened to just one side of a case and after 2.5years of kids being with the sole parent after an emergency endangerment order for being physically abused. Worst judge and person I've ever met. She deserves to work at a fast food line at Mc D's. Her behavior and demeanor is sad and I'm incredibly sad to even be a resident in Oregon. May she have to pay for what she has done someday, karma sucks

Litigant

Comment #: OR500
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Fair. Took the time to explain her ruling. I felt heard. Compassionate. Treated me with respect.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OR464
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Makes outlandish rulings, doesn’t allow key party testimony, favors abusers over child safety, does not know or care what mental health is, does not believe coronavirus is real and rules as such, allows testimony of whichever party she favors and bars other testimony. Wields her power as a judge while also refusing to hear evidence. Clearly has bias against domestic violence survivors and does not know of or understand coercive control.