Hon. Timothy Barnack See Rating Details
Circuit Court Judge
Circuit Court
Jackson County
Judicial District 1
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.5 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   6.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Timothy Barnack


Comments


Other

Comment #: OR587
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Judge Barnack fails to use forensic evidence to find the truth in cases he presides over. He has a belief that he is able to determine truth through simply listening to a persons testimony. This false perception Is invalidated in almost every scientific study. What this approach allows is pathological liars to manipulate the courts. Mr Barnack lacks the intelligence to see through these histrionic fabricators which makes it impossible for him to serve fairly in his official capacity. Furthermore judge Barnack fails to disclose conflicts in cases that come before him. This [redacted] activity can be a huge benefit or detriment to litigants that come before the court depending on the side you’re on, but this creates unjust opinions.

Other

Comment #: OR418
Rating:8.0
Comments:
I had to appear before judge Barnack from two counties over in a very high profile stalking case. Judge barnack spent 5 hours listening to evidence and false evidence put on my the petitioner. He could tell that this high profile individual was untruthful, but he didn’t charge her with perjury, even though text messages proved she was lying. In the end judge barnack dismissed the stalking case. I personally believe he is a very smart guy, he favors prosecutors and police more than what I would like to see, but a lot of judges do. Overall, if I lived in Jackson county, I would vote for his re-election.

Other

Comment #: OR364
Rating:9.0
Comments:
I witnessed a few of the hearings presented to Judge Barnack and he was very respectful and fair, based on evidence. He is progressive, thoughtful, and wise. A good man who I hope one day gets to serve on a higher seat.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: OR230
Rating:7.5
Comments:
Judge Barnack is awesome. He is a great "judge" in that he can sniff out garbage very fast and can also tell when a person in front of him needs a break. He has dismissed several of my cases simply because the charges were not appropriate, even though technically correct. At the same time, when someone needs to get whacked, he will do it - especially on repeat DUIIs