Hon. Lorenzo A. Mejia See Rating Details
Circuit Court Judge
Circuit Court
Jackson County
Judicial District 1
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Lorenzo A. Mejia


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: OR149
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If you are a man facing divorce, never accept this judge as the trail judge for your divorce. He is highly arrogant, completely indifferent to fairness for men, vindictive, always assumes that the men in civil divorce cases are automatically the bad guy (even when being a devoted father has been the case all along), and practically endorses women in what is in effect cross-state kidnapping of children against both the will of the father and state laws. He is lazy, ignores the applicable laws of other states, will not protect the parental rights of fathers and is plainly vicious to the men facing divorce. He will also allow lump-sum alimony payments to be structured, whereupon the woman can then evade federal tax obligations, which also becomes an unfair arrangement for the man in the case. If you are a man facing divorce, run from this judge, because he will destroy your life financially, and destroy your rights as a loving father, and fully allow parental alienation to go on.