"The Robing Room: PA State Judges

Hon. Maggie Snow	See Rating Details
Judge Magisterial District
Bucks County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.1 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 6 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Maggie Snow

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: PA532
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Rude and unprofessional, she is a bullie. very biased ,arrogant, decided the case before hearing began, would not let me testify . I will bring a lawyer and a recorder to hearing next time.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: PA478
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Read for warning - When I read these google reviews prior to attending my hearing -
my intial thoughts were “ these are just sore losers “, or irrational people .
Well - NOT THE CASE - after dealing with the most unprofessional, ignorant , disrespectful, judgmental human being… I’ve come to the conclusion the google reviews are 100 % real . This person should absolutely not be assigned to this position. The judge allowed one person to speak , called names , attacked character, accepted lies with no proof , refused to see official exhibits brought by the defendant (to completely debunk lies and made up scenarios) . Completely degrades women . Advice - HIRE A PERSON TO RECORD YOUR SESSION . Transcript a must . If my hearing was recorded last week , she would lose her ability to practice for certain .
Beyond unprofessional and honestly needs to seek a therapist immediately. Unstable . Shame on you Bucks County for allowing this type of nut to practice as a judge . She was a show off , acting like she’s on a tv show . An embarrassment to the county .

Other

Comment #: PA465
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As an abuse victim, sometimes the abuser brings the abused to court. Maggie made her decision before walking in the courtroom. Didn't care to hear anything I said. Insulted my religion and beliefs and insulted me on many levels. Made me want to kill myself for a moment. A terrible judge.

Litigant

Comment #: PA452
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Rude and unprofessional. No words.....After I said that I am not allowing contractor to drive concrete truck on my property over utilities and septic tank, she said that it's okay, contractor's insurance will pay for it, if he will damage it. DO NOT VOTE for Snow.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: PA426
Rating:1.1

Comments:
Rude, biased, and lacks professionalism. Beware if this isn’t bad enough, she will lecture you about something irrelevant to put you in your place. The absolute worst judge and human being!! Beware. Vote not to put her in office.

Litigant

Comment #: PA425
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Snow makes her decisions based on no facts but rather own own biases take over. She’s the worst - not to mention rude and lacks good judgement and any sort of professionalism to the point of purposefully trying to provoke you to step out of line. DO NOT VOTE for Snow.

Litigant

Comment #: PA403
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I just appeared before Snow. She is arrogant, biased, and seems to have decided a case before hearing the facts. She blatantly encouraged my opponent to sue for additional money not included in case before her, She even said she would award for them if it came before her. She had no interest in hearing anything I had to say and spouted facts and opinions that were absolutely incorrect. Beware

Litigant

Comment #: PA157
Rating:1.0

Comments:
My review of Hon. Maggie Snow is not "sour grapes" but simply presented based on FACT, something Snow (from experience) is less than interested in. Multiple reviews of my case and evidence by two qualified attorneys suggested the outcome should've been different - to my advantage. That based on their review of emails, photos, letters, etc.; none of which Snow would accept into evidence, nor would she even review. Given one other strong fact and issue, she should have recused herself from the case, but did not. My error, not paying attention attorney to attend and present my case. She enters the courtroom disheveled and disinterested, as you are wasting her time. She makes this abundantly clear and you'll suffer the consequences or her desire to be anywhere else, but in her own courtroom.
Hire a lawyer. I cannot express this any more clear. If you're not with the Commonwealth, if you're not with representation, if she doesn't like the case, if she's having a bad hair day (likely ANY AND EVERY day), you will lose.
I would suggest (if you can) filing a case in ANY other jurisdiction for you're able to.

Other

Comment #: PA141
Rating:1.0

Comments:
In traffic cases she ALWAYS TAKES SIDE OF Commonwealth PA. Had very bad experience with her. Cop was perjuring himself giving his testimony against me. Instead of questioning hin, she was trying to pock my testimony. In traffic cases (not sure about others), she use the principal for the defendants "Guilty till proven innocent in my court", which is never thecase anyway. If you look in her court records, her traffic conviction rate ~ 100%. Judje is presumtionist and bias. In my opinion, she should never be let practice the law.