Hon. Maggie Snow See Rating Details
Judge
Magisterial District
Bucks County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Maggie Snow


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: PA157
Rating:1.0
Comments:
My review of Hon. Maggie Snow is not "sour grapes" but simply presented based on FACT, something Snow (from experience) is less than interested in. Multiple reviews of my case and evidence by two qualified attorneys suggested the outcome should've been different - to my advantage. That based on their review of emails, photos, letters, etc.; none of which Snow would accept into evidence, nor would she even review. Given one other strong fact and issue, she should have recused herself from the case, but did not. My error, not paying attention attorney to attend and present my case. She enters the courtroom disheveled and disinterested, as you are wasting her time. She makes this abundantly clear and you'll suffer the consequences or her desire to be anywhere else, but in her own courtroom.
Hire a lawyer. I cannot express this any more clear. If you're not with the Commonwealth, if you're not with representation, if she doesn't like the case, if she's having a bad hair day (likely ANY AND EVERY day), you will lose.
I would suggest (if you can) filing a case in ANY other jurisdiction for you're able to.

Other

Comment #: PA141
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In traffic cases she ALWAYS TAKES SIDE OF Commonwealth PA. Had very bad experience with her. Cop was perjuring himself giving his testimony against me. Instead of questioning hin, she was trying to pock my testimony. In traffic cases (not sure about others), she use the principal for the defendants "Guilty till proven innocent in my court", which is never thecase anyway. If you look in her court records, her traffic conviction rate ~ 100%. Judje is presumtionist and bias. In my opinion, she should never be let practice the law.