Hon. Patricia E. Coonahan See Rating Details
Judge
Common Pleas
Montgomery County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Patricia E. Coonahan


Comments


Other

Comment #: PA441
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Had her during custody hearing she granted the father custody and ripped the carpet from those that raised the child from day 1. Visitation was given but only a few hrs biweekly. Telephone calls are restricted to certain days and a 15 minute window. I feel that we are living in a communist country with so many restrictions. Not looking out for the child and her well being. The custody transfer was not done gradually but immediately removed from the only home the child knew. Very disappointed and feel she needs to step down or removed from the courts.

Litigant

Comment #: PA289
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
abuses official office and power, supersedes authority and jurisdiction, admits to not knowing the law, doesn't apply the law, discriminates against disabled,starves-out children,rulings partial towards favored party, lacks conscious,blatantly lies in opinions.

Litigant

Comment #: PA237
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She imparts unfair and impartial justice - She is a violator of the Rule of law. Useless