Hon. Peter F. Rogers See Rating Details
Common Pleas
Philadelphia County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.2 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Peter F. Rogers


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: PA130
Judge Rogers, was the worst! He dismissed my petition based on the fact that he thought I was trying to get out of my responsibility or caring for my daughter and because he did not want to mess with the child support that my ex is getting. He was very rude and acted as if I was annoying him with my petition and had the heir of a bully and did not site any law to back up his position. He should be removed from the bench as no one has had anything good to say about him.


Comment #: PA1
Judge Rogers didn't try the case based on the facts or even the matter before the court. He denied the plaintiff the opportunity to present supporting evidence and refused to hear from witnesses. This resulted in his releasing a 2 year old child into the hands of a mother convicted of assault on two ocassions when if the court had heard the case and supporting evidence of abuse at the hands of the mother he would have ruled in the best interest of the child. Instead Judge Rogers discriminated against the plaintiff and reduced his parental rights with no evidence of any wrong doing on behalf of the plaintiff with provisions in the order to have his rights terminated altogether.