"The Robing Room: SC State Judges

Hon. Rochelle Y. Conits	See Rating Details
Judge Family Court
Greenville County Thirteenth	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.6 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Rochelle Y. Conits

Comments

Other

Comment #: SC107
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Horrible judge conits will not consider your income when placing financial resposibilities on you. She also does not care about primary caregiver facts and will place children with whomever has the money

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: SC69
Rating:2.2

Comments:
Completely unfair when deciding a 'runner case' of ex-wife leaving upon ex-husband arriving to SC to be near child. Not only did she allow ex-wife to depart the state but she forced ex-husband to pay for ex-wife's patty's fees.

Other

Comment #: SC59
Rating:1.0

Comments:
If you get this judge, pray that you can get a continuance or anything to get another judge. She does not prepare (she has asked to be reminded, quote, WHY AM I HERE?), she refuses to read documents provided by council and is biased towards the attorneys, AKA, if she doesn't like your attorney, you're screwed, she's going to rule against you. She acts annoyed to be even be there, hello you're the JUDGE! It's your job, if you don't like it go get a job at Pizza Hut! This person should NOT be in this position, she has zero disregard for the children and families involved.

Other

Comment #: SC26
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Conits disregarded many Due Process Rights and Rules. She ruled prior to all parties being heard even after she was informed that her office and the opposing attorneys had 'overlooked' a valid motion for continuance and all parties were not present.